cciia.org.cn 2024-9-5 11:30:02 最高(gao)人民法(fa)院新聞局
仲(zhong)裁(cai)是(shi)我(wo)國(guo)法(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)(lv)規定的糾(jiu)紛解(jie)決(jue)(jue)(jue)制(zhi)度，也(ye)是(shi)國(guo)際(ji)(ji)通行的解(jie)決(jue)(jue)(jue)經貿投資(zi)爭議的重要(yao)途徑。黨(dang)的二十屆三中(zhong)全(quan)會對(dui)(dui)加強涉外法(fa)(fa)(fa)治建設、健(jian)全(quan)國(guo)際(ji)(ji)商事(shi)仲(zhong)裁(cai)制(zhi)度作出重要(yao)決(jue)(jue)(jue)策(ce)部署(shu)。“十四五(wu)”規劃(hua)和《粵港澳(ao)大(da)灣區發展規劃(hua)綱要(yao)》明確支(zhi)(zhi)持香(xiang)港建設亞太地(di)區國(guo)際(ji)(ji)法(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)(lv)及爭議解(jie)決(jue)(jue)(jue)服(fu)務中(zhong)心。健(jian)全(quan)國(guo)際(ji)(ji)商事(shi)仲(zhong)裁(cai)司法(fa)(fa)(fa)審查(cha)制(zhi)度，充分發揮司法(fa)(fa)(fa)支(zhi)(zhi)持和監督仲(zhong)裁(cai)的職能作用(yong)，支(zhi)(zhi)持香(xiang)港建設亞太地(di)區國(guo)際(ji)(ji)法(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)(lv)及爭議解(jie)決(jue)(jue)(jue)服(fu)務中(zhong)心，對(dui)(dui)于(yu)促進高水平(ping)對(dui)(dui)外開(kai)放和高質量共(gong)建“一帶一路”，深化(hua)粵港澳(ao)大(da)灣區規則銜接、機制(zhi)對(dui)(dui)接，營(ying)造市場化(hua)法(fa)(fa)(fa)治化(hua)國(guo)際(ji)(ji)化(hua)一流營(ying)商環境，具有重要(yao)意(yi)義。
人民法(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)始終堅持(chi)以審判工作(zuo)現代化(hua)支撐和(he)服(fu)務中國(guo)式現代化(hua)，全面準(zhun)確(que)(que)、堅定(ding)不移貫徹“一(yi)國(guo)兩制”方針和(he)黨中央決(jue)策部(bu)署，依(yi)法(fa)公正高效辦(ban)理(li)各(ge)類涉(she)港(gang)仲裁(cai)司(si)法(fa)審查案(an)(an)(an)件(jian)(jian)。2019年(nian)以來，人民法(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)共受(shou)理(li)涉(she)港(gang)仲裁(cai)司(si)法(fa)審查案(an)(an)(an)件(jian)(jian)1000余件(jian)(jian)。截至(zhi)2024年(nian)4月，僅(jin)香港(gang)國(guo)際仲裁(cai)中心已(yi)向內地法(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)提(ti)出保全協(xie)助(zhu)申(shen)請(qing)119份，涉(she)及(ji)標的(de)金額超過300億元人民幣，內地法(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)從受(shou)理(li)協(xie)助(zhu)香港(gang)仲裁(cai)的(de)保全申(shen)請(qing)到(dao)保全措施執行完畢的(de)平(ping)均期限為28.3天。本次發(fa)布的(de)6件(jian)(jian)典型案(an)(an)(an)例既包括申(shen)請(qing)確(que)(que)認(ren)涉(she)港(gang)仲裁(cai)協(xie)議效力案(an)(an)(an)件(jian)(jian)、協(xie)助(zhu)香港(gang)仲裁(cai)的(de)保全案(an)(an)(an)件(jian)(jian)，也(ye)包括申(shen)請(qing)認(ren)可和(he)執行香港(gang)仲裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)案(an)(an)(an)件(jian)(jian)，生(sheng)動展(zhan)現了(le)人民法(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)依(yi)法(fa)支持(chi)香港(gang)仲裁(cai)、推進國(guo)際仲裁(cai)高質量發(fa)展(zhan)的(de)司(si)法(fa)立場。
一(yi)是以便捷高效(xiao)的(de)(de)(de)保(bao)全(quan)(quan)協助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)保(bao)障香(xiang)(xiang)港仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)的(de)(de)(de)順(shun)利(li)進行(xing)。仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)保(bao)全(quan)(quan)對于保(bao)障仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序順(shun)利(li)進行(xing)以及(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)的(de)(de)(de)最終執(zhi)行(xing)具有重(zhong)要作(zuo)用。案例1中，內(nei)地(di)法(fa)院優化協助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)保(bao)全(quan)(quan)機制，為香(xiang)(xiang)港仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序提供了便捷高效(xiao)的(de)(de)(de)保(bao)全(quan)(quan)協助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)，并使得仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)申(shen)請人(ren)其后申(shen)請認可和執(zhi)行(xing)香(xiang)(xiang)港仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)的(de)(de)(de)案件得到快(kuai)速處理以及(ji)順(shun)利(li)執(zhi)行(xing)，為兩地(di)司(si)法(fa)互(hu)助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)提供了有益示范。
二是(shi)(shi)支(zhi)持和鼓勵當事人選(xuan)擇(ze)香港仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)解決(jue)糾紛(fen)(fen)。仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議是(shi)(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)制(zhi)度的(de)(de)基石，是(shi)(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機(ji)構取得(de)管(guan)轄權(quan)、啟動(dong)程序的(de)(de)前提性條(tiao)件(jian)。案(an)例(li)(li)3準(zhun)確(que)適(shi)用(yong)(yong)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議沖突規范，認(ren)定仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)地(di)法律即香港法律為仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議效力(li)準(zhun)據法，進(jin)而適(shi)用(yong)(yong)香港《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)例(li)(li)》確(que)認(ren)案(an)涉仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議有效。案(an)例(li)(li)4依據香港《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)例(li)(li)》中(zhong)(zhong)對(dui)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議“書面形式”的(de)(de)構成要件(jian)進(jin)行解釋(shi)，認(ren)可(ke)當事人通(tong)過援引方式達成仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議。案(an)例(li)(li)5準(zhun)確(que)查明香港法律，尊重當事人在(zai)港仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)意愿，針對(dui)表(biao)述(shu)不規范的(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議予以(yi)合理解釋(shi)，明確(que)協(xie)議約定所指向(xiang)的(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機(ji)構的(de)(de)含義。上(shang)述(shu)三案(an)的(de)(de)處(chu)理凸顯了內地(di)法院準(zhun)確(que)適(shi)用(yong)(yong)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議準(zhun)據法、支(zhi)持當事人選(xuan)擇(ze)在(zai)香港進(jin)行仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)，促進(jin)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)在(zai)多元化糾紛(fen)(fen)解決(jue)機(ji)制(zhi)中(zhong)(zhong)發揮(hui)重要作用(yong)(yong)。
三是便利香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)跨境執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)。人民(min)法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)依據最高人民(min)法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)(yuan)《關于(yu)內(nei)地與香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)特別行(xing)(xing)政區相(xiang)互執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)的安排》（以下簡(jian)稱(cheng)《安排》）及(ji)《關于(yu)內(nei)地與香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)特別行(xing)(xing)政區相(xiang)互執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)的補充安排》（以下簡(jian)稱(cheng)《補充安排》）公正高效認可和執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)，有力促進香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)建(jian)設亞太地區國際法(fa)(fa)律及(ji)爭議解決(jue)(jue)服務(wu)中心。案例(li)2尊(zun)重(zhong)當事(shi)人合意將仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭變更為獨任(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)的約定(ding)，保障(zhang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)意思自(zi)治(zhi)。案例(li)6準確認定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)籍屬，并(bing)尊(zun)重(zhong)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭依據仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規則頒發仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序令(ling)及(ji)針對當事(shi)人違反(fan)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序令(ling)的行(xing)(xing)為作出的相(xiang)關決(jue)(jue)定(ding)。上述(shu)兩(liang)案的處(chu)理彰顯了依法(fa)(fa)支持和保障(zhang)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序、便利香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)在內(nei)地依法(fa)(fa)得到(dao)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)的鮮明司法(fa)(fa)態度。
案例1優化機制高效辦理保全協助案件 保障香港仲裁裁決順利執行—— G公司申請協助仲裁保全案
【基本案情】
2017年(nian)(nian)4月10日(ri)，注冊在開(kai)曼群島的(de)G公(gong)司和V公(gong)司簽訂了(le)《貸款(kuan)協(xie)議》，并約定“任何(he)一方(fang)均有(you)權(quan)將相關爭議提(ti)交(jiao)香港國際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)中心(xin)(xin)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)”。后雙方(fang)因(yin)履約發生糾(jiu)紛，G公(gong)司于(yu)2022年(nian)(nian)5月18日(ri)以(yi)V公(gong)司和美(mei)籍(ji)居民(min)蘇(su)(su)某為(wei)被申請人(ren)向(xiang)香港國際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)中心(xin)(xin)申請仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)并提(ti)出(chu)(chu)財產(chan)保(bao)全(quan)申請，又于(yu)6月9日(ri)向(xiang)江蘇(su)(su)省蘇(su)(su)州市(shi)中級人(ren)民(min)法院（以(yi)下簡稱蘇(su)(su)州中院）提(ti)交(jiao)了(le)保(bao)全(quan)申請書(shu)、仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議等相關材(cai)料(liao)以(yi)及香港國際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)中心(xin)(xin)出(chu)(chu)具的(de)函件（掃描件），并提(ti)供了(le)財產(chan)保(bao)全(quan)擔保(bao)。G公(gong)司陳述，因(yin)疫情原因(yin)，香港國際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)中心(xin)(xin)無(wu)法快速通過(guo)郵寄(ji)方(fang)式(shi)轉遞相關材(cai)料(liao)。
【處理結果】
蘇州中(zhong)(zhong)院受(shou)理G公司的財產(chan)保全(quan)申請后(hou)，向香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)際仲裁(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心工(gong)作郵箱發送電子郵件，及時核(he)實材料和案件的真(zhen)實性。經香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)際仲裁(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心回郵確認(ren)，蘇州中(zhong)(zhong)院于2022年6月(yue)13日即作出財產(chan)保全(quan)裁(cai)定，并于2022年6月(yue)16日依據該裁(cai)定查封(feng)了被申請人V公司和蘇某(mou)持有的某(mou)公司股權。
2023年(nian)11月21日，香港(gang)國際仲(zhong)裁(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心對案(an)涉(she)爭議(yi)作出仲(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)(jue)。其后，G公(gong)司又向蘇(su)(su)州(zhou)中(zhong)(zhong)院(yuan)申請(qing)認(ren)可(ke)和(he)執(zhi)行(xing)該仲(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)(jue)，蘇(su)(su)州(zhou)中(zhong)(zhong)院(yuan)審查認(ren)為案(an)涉(she)仲(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)(jue)符(fu)合(he)《安排(pai)》《補(bu)充(chong)安排(pai)》規定(ding)的應予認(ren)可(ke)和(he)執(zhi)行(xing)的情形，遂(sui)裁(cai)定(ding)認(ren)可(ke)和(he)執(zhi)行(xing)案(an)涉(she)仲(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)(jue)。
【典型意義】
本(ben)案(an)是人(ren)(ren)民(min)法院根據《最高(gao)人(ren)(ren)民(min)法院關于(yu)內地(di)與香港(gang)(gang)特別行(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)區法院就仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)程序相互協助(zhu)保(bao)全(quan)的(de)(de)安排(pai)》協助(zhu)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)保(bao)全(quan)的(de)(de)一(yi)(yi)宗范例(li)。該案(an)的(de)(de)審查時值疫情(qing)期間，蘇(su)州中院充分考慮到仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)財產保(bao)全(quan)需求(qiu)的(de)(de)緊迫(po)性以及疫情(qing)期間從香港(gang)(gang)向內地(di)轉遞材料(liao)(liao)的(de)(de)客觀不便，靈活采用(yong)郵(you)件(jian)方(fang)式與香港(gang)(gang)國際仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)中心核實(shi)確認材料(liao)(liao)的(de)(de)真實(shi)性，于(yu)一(yi)(yi)周時間內完成審查、裁(cai)定(ding)和(he)采取保(bao)全(quan)措(cuo)施等各項流程，其便捷高(gao)效的(de)(de)工作方(fang)法獲得(de)了仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)機構和(he)當事人(ren)(ren)的(de)(de)高(gao)度(du)評價(jia)。其后，處理實(shi)體爭(zheng)議的(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)亦得(de)到蘇(su)州中院的(de)(de)認可和(he)執行(xing)(xing)(xing)，充分體現協助(zhu)保(bao)全(quan)有效促進香港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue)在內地(di)順(shun)利執行(xing)(xing)(xing)的(de)(de)功能。
【案號】江蘇省蘇州(zhou)市中級人民法院（2022）蘇05財(cai)保146號
案例2尊重當事人仲裁程序選擇權 認可和執行香港仲裁裁決——某金融公司申請認可和執行香港仲裁裁決案
【基本案情】
2007年12月(yue)11日(ri)(ri)，某(mou)(mou)(mou)金(jin)融(rong)(rong)公司(si)(si)與某(mou)(mou)(mou)制(zhi)鹽公司(si)(si)簽訂《貸款合(he)同》，約定(ding)“任(ren)(ren)(ren)何爭議(yi)均(jun)應根據《聯合(he)國(guo)(guo)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)貿(mao)易法委員(yuan)(yuan)會仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規則(ze)》通(tong)(tong)過仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)最終(zhong)解決。仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)地(di)點為(wei)香(xiang)港(gang)，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)為(wei)香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中心，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭由3名(ming)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)組(zu)成。”因某(mou)(mou)(mou)制(zhi)鹽公司(si)(si)未按約定(ding)清(qing)償借款，某(mou)(mou)(mou)金(jin)融(rong)(rong)公司(si)(si)遂向香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中心申請(qing)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)。香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中心于2019年8月(yue)12日(ri)(ri)作出仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決，某(mou)(mou)(mou)金(jin)融(rong)(rong)公司(si)(si)于2020年8月(yue)17日(ri)(ri)向四(si)川(chuan)省(sheng)自貢市中級人民法院(yuan)申請(qing)認可和(he)執行該(gai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決。某(mou)(mou)(mou)制(zhi)鹽公司(si)(si)提出《貸款合(he)同》約定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭應由三名(ming)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)組(zu)成，香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中心指定(ding)獨(du)任(ren)(ren)(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)，與約定(ding)不(bu)符，違反《安排》第(di)七(qi)條第(di)一款第(di)四(si)項關于“仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭的(de)組(zu)成與當事(shi)(shi)人之間的(de)協(xie)議(yi)不(bu)符”的(de)規定(ding)，故仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決不(bu)應予以執行。經(jing)查，案涉裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決書載明雙方當事(shi)(shi)人寫信請(qing)求(qiu)香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中心任(ren)(ren)(ren)命仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)，保某(mou)(mou)(mou)先生被任(ren)(ren)(ren)命為(wei)案涉爭議(yi)的(de)獨(du)任(ren)(ren)(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)后(hou)，雙方又通(tong)(tong)過一封(feng)共同簽署的(de)信函(han)對(dui)此任(ren)(ren)(ren)命進行確(que)認。
【裁判結果】
四川省自貢市(shi)中級(ji)人民法(fa)院認(ren)為，仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭組成(cheng)雖然改變了《貸款協議》中有關由(you)三名(ming)仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員組成(cheng)仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭的原始(shi)約(yue)定(ding)，但對由(you)獨(du)任仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員進行裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決的該項改變系經雙方同意后達成(cheng)的一致(zhi)意見，且某(mou)制鹽公(gong)司(si)亦沒有根據《聯(lian)合國國際貿易法(fa)委員會仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)》相(xiang)關規(gui)定(ding)在仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)過程中對獨(du)任仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員的任命(ming)提出異議。案(an)涉仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決有關獨(du)任仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員的任命(ming)不(bu)構成(cheng)違反《安排(pai)》第(di)七條第(di)一款第(di)四項規(gui)定(ding)的情形，遂(sui)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)定(ding)執行案(an)涉仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決。
【典型意義】
國(guo)際商事(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)的(de)核心在于充分(fen)尊(zun)重當(dang)事(shi)人(ren)意思自(zi)治。國(guo)際商事(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)通過當(dang)事(shi)人(ren)的(de)意思自(zi)治來選(xuan)擇、開啟、修改、推動整個仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序。本案協議雖約定應(ying)由三名仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)員組(zu)成(cheng)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)庭(ting)，但在仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序中，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機構任命獨任仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)員的(de)變更(geng)系經雙方共同(tong)簽(qian)署書面函件(jian)予(yu)(yu)以確(que)認，不屬(shu)于《安排》第七條第一款第四項規(gui)定的(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)庭(ting)組(zu)成(cheng)與(yu)當(dang)事(shi)人(ren)協議不符的(de)不予(yu)(yu)執行(xing)事(shi)由。本案表明人(ren)民法(fa)(fa)院在辦(ban)理仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)司法(fa)(fa)審查(cha)案件(jian)中依(yi)法(fa)(fa)對仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序自(zi)治、誠信仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)原則予(yu)(yu)以充分(fen)尊(zun)重，并給予(yu)(yu)積極保障。
【案號】四川(chuan)(chuan)省自(zi)貢市中級人(ren)民法院(yuan)(2020)川(chuan)(chuan)03認港(gang)1號(hao)
案例3正確認定仲裁協議準據法 支持當事人選擇香港仲裁——天津某酒店管理公司申請確認仲裁協議效力案
【基本案情】
天津某酒店管(guan)理公司與香港(gang)(gang)某公司于2013年1月25日簽訂(ding)《管(guan)理合同》，約定該(gai)合同根據內地法(fa)律(lv)解釋，在(zai)(zai)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款(kuan)中(zhong)則(ze)約定產(chan)生糾紛“由國(guo)(guo)(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)商(shang)(shang)(shang)會依照在(zai)(zai)收到仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)通(tong)(tong)知之日有效的(de)國(guo)(guo)(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)商(shang)(shang)(shang)會仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)規則(ze)（或其類似的(de)后續規則(ze)）通(tong)(tong)過仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)加以(yi)解決。指(zhi)定機構為(wei)國(guo)(guo)(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)商(shang)(shang)(shang)會。仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)地點為(wei)香港(gang)(gang)”。天津某酒店管(guan)理公司認(ren)為(wei)上(shang)述條(tiao)(tiao)款(kuan)中(zhong)的(de)“國(guo)(guo)(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)商(shang)(shang)(shang)會”不具備仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)職能，亦不存在(zai)(zai)“國(guo)(guo)(guo)(guo)際(ji)(ji)商(shang)(shang)(shang)會”這一仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)機構，故(gu)向法(fa)院申請確認(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款(kuan)無效。
【裁判結果】
天(tian)津市第一(yi)中級人民法(fa)(fa)院認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)，天(tian)津某(mou)(mou)酒(jiu)店(dian)管(guan)(guan)(guan)理公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)與香港某(mou)(mou)公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)簽訂(ding)的《管(guan)(guan)(guan)理合(he)同》中僅約(yue)定了合(he)同適(shi)用的法(fa)(fa)律(lv)，不能(neng)作(zuo)為(wei)(wei)確認(ren)(ren)合(he)同中仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)(kuan)效力適(shi)用的法(fa)(fa)律(lv)，應適(shi)用約(yue)定仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)地的法(fa)(fa)律(lv)即香港法(fa)(fa)律(lv)判斷仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)(kuan)效力。根(gen)據香港《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條例》規(gui)定，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)(kuan)效力取決于當事(shi)人將爭(zheng)議交付仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)的意(yi)思表示(shi)。本(ben)案中，天(tian)津某(mou)(mou)酒(jiu)店(dian)管(guan)(guan)(guan)理公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)與香港某(mou)(mou)公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)簽訂(ding)的仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)(kuan)具備當事(shi)人將爭(zheng)議交付仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)的意(yi)思表示(shi)，應認(ren)(ren)定為(wei)(wei)有效仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)(kuan)，遂裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)定駁回天(tian)津某(mou)(mou)酒(jiu)店(dian)管(guan)(guan)(guan)理公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)要求確認(ren)(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協議無效的申請。
【典型意義】
本(ben)案準確(que)(que)(que)把握了仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款效(xiao)力的(de)(de)(de)準據(ju)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)判斷原(yuan)則(ze)。《中(zhong)(zhong)華人(ren)(ren)(ren)民共(gong)和國涉外民事(shi)(shi)(shi)關系(xi)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)》第(di)(di)十(shi)八(ba)條(tiao)(tiao)規(gui)定(ding)：“當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)可(ke)以(yi)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)選(xuan)擇(ze)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)的(de)(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)。當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)沒有(you)選(xuan)擇(ze)的(de)(de)(de)，適(shi)(shi)用(yong)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)所在(zai)地(di)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)或(huo)者仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)地(di)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)。”本(ben)案當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)僅(jin)約(yue)定(ding)了合同適(shi)(shi)用(yong)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)即合同準據(ju)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)，但(dan)沒有(you)約(yue)定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)的(de)(de)(de)準據(ju)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)，故應當(dang)參照(zhao)《中(zhong)(zhong)華人(ren)(ren)(ren)民共(gong)和國涉外民事(shi)(shi)(shi)關系(xi)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)》第(di)(di)十(shi)八(ba)條(tiao)(tiao)的(de)(de)(de)規(gui)定(ding)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)地(di)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)即香港(gang)(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)判斷仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)效(xiao)力。根據(ju)香港(gang)(gang)(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)例》，仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)是(shi)指當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)同意(yi)將他們(men)之間一項確(que)(que)(que)定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)契約(yue)性(xing)或(huo)非契約(yue)性(xing)的(de)(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)關系(xi)中(zhong)(zhong)已經發生(sheng)或(huo)者可(ke)能發生(sheng)的(de)(de)(de)一切爭議(yi)或(huo)某(mou)些爭議(yi)交付仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)的(de)(de)(de)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)，仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)可(ke)以(yi)采取(qu)合同中(zhong)(zhong)的(de)(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款形(xing)式(shi)或(huo)單獨的(de)(de)(de)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)形(xing)式(shi)。可(ke)見，香港(gang)(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)并不以(yi)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)的(de)(de)(de)明(ming)(ming)確(que)(que)(que)唯一性(xing)作(zuo)為仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)效(xiao)力判斷的(de)(de)(de)必(bi)備要件(jian)(jian)。本(ben)案中(zhong)(zhong)當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)具有(you)明(ming)(ming)確(que)(que)(que)將糾紛提(ti)交仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)的(de)(de)(de)書面意(yi)思表示，符合香港(gang)(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)關于(yu)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款生(sheng)效(xiao)的(de)(de)(de)要件(jian)(jian)，應認定(ding)案涉仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)(tiao)款有(you)效(xiao)。人(ren)(ren)(ren)民法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)院準確(que)(que)(que)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)香港(gang)(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)律(lv)確(que)(que)(que)定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)(xie)(xie)議(yi)的(de)(de)(de)效(xiao)力，鼓勵當(dang)事(shi)(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)(ren)選(xuan)擇(ze)香港(gang)(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)，為推(tui)動兩地(di)建立融合共(gong)享的(de)(de)(de)多元化(hua)糾紛解決機制提(ti)供了實踐依據(ju)。
【案號】天津市第(di)一(yi)中級人民法院（2021）津01民特1號
案例4準確適用香港法律 認定合同所援引文件構成有效仲裁協議——W公司申請認可和執行香港仲裁裁決案
【基本案情】
W公(gong)司(si)與(yu)寧(ning)德某(mou)(mou)工(gong)貿公(gong)司(si)于(yu)2008年10月(yue)20日簽(qian)訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)《供(gong)應(ying)(ying)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》，該(gai)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)第(di)(di)(di)16條(tiao)約定(ding)“因(yin)(yin)履行(xing)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)產生的(de)(de)(de)任何糾紛均(jun)應(ying)(ying)在(zai)香港國(guo)際仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心(xin)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)”。履行(xing)過程中(zhong)(zhong)，該(gai)兩公(gong)司(si)又與(yu)某(mou)(mou)炭(tan)業公(gong)司(si)三(san)方簽(qian)訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》，該(gai)《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》由(you)三(san)方確認(ren)(ren)：在(zai)《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》中(zhong)(zhong)新增的(de)(de)(de)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)應(ying)(ying)作為新條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)添加到《供(gong)應(ying)(ying)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》中(zhong)(zhong)；發(fa)生變更(geng)的(de)(de)(de)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)應(ying)(ying)以(yi)《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》為準；除第(di)(di)(di)6、7、10至13條(tiao)外，其余未修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)按《供(gong)應(ying)(ying)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》規定(ding)予(yu)以(yi)解決(jue)。后因(yin)(yin)寧(ning)德某(mou)(mou)工(gong)貿公(gong)司(si)與(yu)某(mou)(mou)炭(tan)業公(gong)司(si)均(jun)違反《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》，W公(gong)司(si)向香港國(guo)際仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心(xin)申(shen)請仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)，香港國(guo)際仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)心(xin)于(yu)2016年3月(yue)23日至12月(yue)28日分別(bie)作出(chu)多份(fen)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)決(jue)。W公(gong)司(si)向福建省南平(ping)市中(zhong)(zhong)級(ji)人民法(fa)院(yuan)申(shen)請認(ren)(ren)可和(he)(he)執(zhi)行(xing)案涉(she)(she)裁(cai)(cai)決(jue)，某(mou)(mou)炭(tan)業公(gong)司(si)辯稱《修訂(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)》并未約定(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)，故某(mou)(mou)炭(tan)業公(gong)司(si)與(yu)W公(gong)司(si)之間不存(cun)在(zai)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)協(xie)議(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)，根(gen)據《安(an)排》第(di)(di)(di)七條(tiao)第(di)(di)(di)一款(kuan)(kuan)第(di)(di)(di)一項的(de)(de)(de)規定(ding)，案涉(she)(she)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)決(jue)應(ying)(ying)不予(yu)認(ren)(ren)可和(he)(he)執(zhi)行(xing)。
【裁判結果】
福建省南平市中級(ji)人民法院認為(wei)(wei)，《修(xiu)訂協(xie)議(yi)》明確援(yuan)引(yin)了《供(gong)應(ying)協(xie)議(yi)》，且約定(ding)(ding)《修(xiu)訂協(xie)議(yi)》對《供(gong)應(ying)協(xie)議(yi)》作(zuo)出的(de)(de)(de)變更內容系《供(gong)應(ying)協(xie)議(yi)》的(de)(de)(de)一部分(fen)(fen)，表(biao)明某(mou)(mou)炭業(ye)(ye)公司具有(you)按照《供(gong)應(ying)協(xie)議(yi)》中仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條款解決爭(zheng)議(yi)的(de)(de)(de)意思表(biao)示(shi)。根據香港(gang)(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條例(li)》第(di)(di)19條第(di)(di)1款規(gui)定(ding)(ding)，“在(zai)(zai)合同(tong)中提(ti)及載有(you)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條款的(de)(de)(de)任(ren)何文件(jian)(jian)的(de)(de)(de)，只要此(ci)種提(ti)及可使該(gai)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條款成(cheng)(cheng)為(wei)(wei)該(gai)合同(tong)的(de)(de)(de)一部分(fen)(fen)，即(ji)構成(cheng)(cheng)書面形(xing)式的(de)(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)協(xie)議(yi)”；第(di)(di)19條第(di)(di)2款規(gui)定(ding)(ding)，“在(zai)(zai)不(bu)影響(xiang)第(di)(di)（1）款原則下，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)協(xie)議(yi)如(ru)符合以(yi)(yi)下規(gui)定(ding)(ding)，即(ji)屬(shu)以(yi)(yi)書面訂立：（a）該(gai)協(xie)議(yi)是(shi)載于文件(jian)(jian)之內的(de)(de)(de)，不(bu)論該(gai)文件(jian)(jian)是(shi)否由該(gai)協(xie)議(yi)的(de)(de)(de)各方簽署”。可見，香港(gang)(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條例(li)》允許通過援(yuan)引(yin)包含仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)條款的(de)(de)(de)其他文件(jian)(jian)作(zuo)為(wei)(wei)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)協(xie)議(yi)的(de)(de)(de)書面形(xing)式，而不(bu)要求當事人必須在(zai)(zai)被(bei)援(yuan)引(yin)的(de)(de)(de)文件(jian)(jian)上簽字，故某(mou)(mou)炭業(ye)(ye)公司與W公司之間就爭(zheng)議(yi)事項達成(cheng)(cheng)了有(you)效仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)協(xie)議(yi)。據此(ci)，該(gai)院裁(cai)(cai)定(ding)(ding)認可和(he)執(zhi)行案(an)涉仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)決。
【典型意義】
本案核心問(wen)題(ti)為(wei)當事人之(zhi)間是(shi)否(fou)存(cun)在(zai)(zai)有(you)效(xiao)的(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議。依據《安排》第(di)(di)七條(tiao)第(di)(di)一(yi)款(kuan)(kuan)第(di)(di)一(yi)項(xiang)“該(gai)(gai)(gai)項(xiang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議依約定(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)準據法(fa)(fa)無(wu)(wu)效(xiao)；或(huo)者未(wei)指明以何(he)種法(fa)(fa)律為(wei)準時，依仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)決地的(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)律是(shi)無(wu)(wu)效(xiao)的(de)(de)”規定(ding)(ding)，本案首先準確認(ren)定(ding)(ding)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議準據法(fa)(fa)為(wei)香港(gang)法(fa)(fa)，其(qi)次查明和(he)(he)適用香港(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)例》第(di)(di)19條(tiao)第(di)(di)1款(kuan)(kuan)、第(di)(di)2款(kuan)(kuan)關于仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議“書(shu)(shu)面(mian)形式(shi)”的(de)(de)規定(ding)(ding)，最后(hou)結合具體(ti)案情就案涉仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協(xie)議是(shi)否(fou)符(fu)合“書(shu)(shu)面(mian)形式(shi)”構(gou)成(cheng)要(yao)件進行(xing)(xing)了詳細分(fen)析。本案中(zhong)，W公(gong)司與(yu)(yu)某炭業公(gong)司雖未(wei)簽署(shu)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)，但其(qi)簽署(shu)的(de)(de)《修訂(ding)協(xie)議》明確未(wei)修訂(ding)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)按《供應協(xie)議》規定(ding)(ding)解(jie)決，W公(gong)司與(yu)(yu)某炭業公(gong)司通過援引包含了仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)的(de)(de)《供應協(xie)議》，使(shi)該(gai)(gai)(gai)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)成(cheng)為(wei)《修訂(ding)協(xie)議》的(de)(de)一(yi)部分(fen)，符(fu)合香港(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)例》中(zhong)“書(shu)(shu)面(mian)形式(shi)”的(de)(de)要(yao)件，故(gu)該(gai)(gai)(gai)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)有(you)效(xiao)。本案為(wei)人民法(fa)(fa)院如何(he)在(zai)(zai)認(ren)可和(he)(he)執行(xing)(xing)階(jie)段依據香港(gang)法(fa)(fa)律審查仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條(tiao)款(kuan)(kuan)的(de)(de)效(xiao)力要(yao)件提供了指引。
【案號】福(fu)建省南平(ping)市(shi)中(zhong)級人(ren)民法(fa)院（2018）閩07認港1號
案例5積極查明和適用香港法律 認定瑕疵仲裁協議效力——柳某申請認可和執行香港仲裁裁決案
【基本案情】
柳某與龍(long)(long)某簽訂三份《借(jie)(jie)款(kuan)協議(yi)》，就出(chu)借(jie)(jie)款(kuan)項、期限、利息(xi)等進行約(yue)定(ding)(ding)，并(bing)約(yue)定(ding)(ding)“協議(yi)項下(xia)一切爭議(yi)與糾紛若無法(fa)通過友好協商(shang)解(jie)決(jue)，應(ying)當提(ti)(ti)交香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際經(jing)濟(ji)(ji)貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)委(wei)(wei)(wei)員(yuan)(yuan)會(hui)，按照(zhao)香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際經(jing)濟(ji)(ji)貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)委(wei)(wei)(wei)員(yuan)(yuan)會(hui)現行程序規則(ze)予以仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)。”因龍(long)(long)某未(wei)按期還本(ben)付息(xi)，柳某向(xiang)中(zhong)國(guo)(guo)國(guo)(guo)際經(jing)濟(ji)(ji)貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)委(wei)(wei)(wei)員(yuan)(yuan)會(hui)香(xiang)港(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)中(zhong)心(xin)(xin)（以下(xia)簡稱(cheng)貿仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)香(xiang)港(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)中(zhong)心(xin)(xin)）申請(qing)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)，貿仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)香(xiang)港(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)中(zhong)心(xin)(xin)作出(chu)裁(cai)決(jue)后，柳某向(xiang)廣(guang)東省(sheng)深圳(zhen)市中(zhong)級人民法(fa)院(yuan)申請(qing)認可(ke)和(he)執行。龍(long)(long)某主(zhu)(zhu)張案涉裁(cai)決(jue)不應(ying)被認可(ke)和(he)執行，主(zhu)(zhu)要理由為：仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)條款(kuan)約(yue)定(ding)(ding)的(de)“香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際經(jing)濟(ji)(ji)貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)委(wei)(wei)(wei)員(yuan)(yuan)會(hui)”并(bing)不能(neng)指向(xiang)唯一的(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)機構(gou)(gou)，故該仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)條款(kuan)無效；龍(long)(long)某還提(ti)(ti)交了其委(wei)(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)香(xiang)港(gang)大律(lv)師出(chu)具(ju)的(de)法(fa)律(lv)意(yi)見書(shu)，認為該協議(yi)約(yue)定(ding)(ding)的(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)機構(gou)(gou)不明(ming)(ming)(ming)確，應(ying)當按香(xiang)港(gang)《仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)條例》第(di)10條及609C章(zhang)規定(ding)(ding)，由香(xiang)港(gang)國(guo)(guo)際仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)中(zhong)心(xin)(xin)對送(song)達(da)文件、委(wei)(wei)(wei)任(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)、仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)員(yuan)(yuan)人數作出(chu)具(ju)體指示。廣(guang)東省(sheng)深圳(zhen)市中(zhong)級人民法(fa)院(yuan)委(wei)(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)某法(fa)律(lv)查(cha)明(ming)(ming)(ming)和(he)商(shang)事調解(jie)中(zhong)心(xin)(xin)查(cha)明(ming)(ming)(ming)香(xiang)港(gang)法(fa)律(lv)，由香(xiang)港(gang)大律(lv)師出(chu)具(ju)法(fa)律(lv)意(yi)見書(shu)，認為香(xiang)港(gang)法(fa)院(yuan)判例表明(ming)(ming)(ming)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)協議(yi)瑕疵并(bing)非罕見，法(fa)庭(ting)應(ying)考慮并(bing)實現合(he)約(yue)方的(de)真實意(yi)向(xiang)，指示合(he)約(yue)方在最合(he)適、最能(neng)反映雙方意(yi)愿的(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)庭(ting)進行仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)。
【裁判結果】
廣(guang)東省深圳市(shi)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)級(ji)人(ren)民法(fa)(fa)院認(ren)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)，案(an)(an)涉(she)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決在(zai)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)作出，應(ying)適用香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)律(lv)審查(cha)該仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)的(de)(de)(de)效(xiao)力。案(an)(an)涉(she)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)雖對仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)的(de)(de)(de)名稱(cheng)(cheng)書(shu)寫不準(zhun)確，但(dan)當事人(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)意(yi)愿清晰，依據(ju)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)律(lv)該仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)是有(you)(you)(you)效(xiao)的(de)(de)(de)。該院通過分析兩份香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)(fa)律(lv)意(yi)見書(shu)的(de)(de)(de)分歧，最終采(cai)納某法(fa)(fa)律(lv)查(cha)明(ming)和商事調解(jie)(jie)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心出具的(de)(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)律(lv)意(yi)見書(shu)，即法(fa)(fa)院應(ying)選擇最符合(he)(he)當事人(ren)從(cong)合(he)(he)同語(yu)言表達出的(de)(de)(de)意(yi)圖、更合(he)(he)理且更有(you)(you)(you)效(xiao)的(de)(de)(de)解(jie)(jie)釋。該院認(ren)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)，從(cong)案(an)(an)涉(she)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)的(de)(de)(de)約定(ding)來看，雖然仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)約定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)名稱(cheng)(cheng)不準(zhun)確，但(dan)當事人(ren)明(ming)顯傾向于機構(gou)(gou)(gou)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)，且香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)現(xian)有(you)(you)(you)八家仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)僅有(you)(you)(you)“中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)國國際經(jing)濟貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)委員會香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心”使用了“國際經(jing)濟貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)委員會”作為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)專有(you)(you)(you)名稱(cheng)(cheng)，與仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)條款(kuan)約定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)名稱(cheng)(cheng)最為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)接近，故認(ren)定(ding)當事人(ren)選擇貿仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心作為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)，遂裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)定(ding)予以認(ren)可和執行。
【典型意義】
當(dang)事(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)約定(ding)的仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)名(ming)稱不準(zhun)確即瑕疵仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協議(yi)是(shi)否影響(xiang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)協議(yi)效(xiao)(xiao)力以及(ji)其后(hou)的仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)，是(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)司法(fa)審查實踐中常見(jian)的問題(ti)。本(ben)案中，被申請人(ren)(ren)提(ti)交香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)大律(lv)(lv)師法(fa)律(lv)(lv)意(yi)見(jian)書，主(zhu)張仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)名(ming)稱不準(zhun)確導致其后(hou)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)應當(dang)按照臨時(shi)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)進行。法(fa)院(yuan)在委(wei)托法(fa)律(lv)(lv)查明機構(gou)(gou)查明香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)律(lv)(lv)的基礎上，根據(ju)“香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)國際經(jing)濟貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)委(wei)員會(hui)”所包含(han)的主(zhu)要特征“國際經(jing)濟貿易仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)委(wei)員會(hui)”，認(ren)定(ding)貿仲(zhong)(zhong)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)中心(xin)系當(dang)事(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)合(he)意(yi)選擇的仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)機構(gou)(gou)，符合(he)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)院(yuan)關于(yu)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)條款的解釋規則，有(you)效(xiao)(xiao)促進并實現了(le)當(dang)事(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)進行機構(gou)(gou)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)的意(yi)愿。本(ben)案充分表明人(ren)(ren)民法(fa)院(yuan)準(zhun)確適用(yong)香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)法(fa)律(lv)(lv)，保障當(dang)事(shi)(shi)人(ren)(ren)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)權利，并積極支持香(xiang)(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)法(fa)治環境多(duo)元化發展的司法(fa)立場。
【案號】廣東省深(shen)圳市中級人民法院（2022）粵03民初(chu)7444號
案例6合理解釋仲裁規則 認可和執行外國仲裁機構在港作出的裁決——德國SE公司等申請認可和執行香港仲裁裁決案
【基本案情】
德(de)國(guo)SE公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)、德(de)國(guo)SA公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)、珠(zhu)海某公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)與J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)自2013年起存在業務往來(lai)。J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)與德(de)國(guo)SE公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)以電(dian)子郵件(jian)交(jiao)換并確定(ding)訂單(dan)后，J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)分(fen)別與德(de)國(guo)SA公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)、珠(zhu)海某公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)簽(qian)署了兩份采購(gou)協議，均約定(ding)發(fa)生糾紛提交(jiao)國(guo)際(ji)商(shang)會(hui)(hui)國(guo)際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)院適用《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)則(ze)》仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)地(di)為香港。德(de)國(guo)SE公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)、德(de)國(guo)SA公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)、珠(zhu)海某公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)以J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)違(wei)約為由(you)向國(guo)際(ji)商(shang)會(hui)(hui)國(guo)際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)院申(shen)請仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)。國(guo)際(ji)商(shang)會(hui)(hui)國(guo)際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)院于2020年9月4日(ri)作出終(zhong)局裁(cai)(cai)決：J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)向珠(zhu)海某公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)支付貨款4962980歐元及利潤損(sun)失、損(sun)害賠(pei)償、滯納金(jin)、利息(xi)等(deng)。德(de)國(guo)SE公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)等(deng)于2021年1月4日(ri)向北京市第(di)(di)四中級人(ren)(ren)民法院申(shen)請認可和(he)執行(xing)該裁(cai)(cai)決。J公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)主張案涉仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)決不應(ying)被認可和(he)執行(xing)，主要理由(you)為：珠(zhu)海某公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)提出《程(cheng)序時間表》晚于仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)庭《第(di)(di)1號仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序令(ling)(ling)》規(gui)(gui)定(ding)的時間，而該程(cheng)序令(ling)(ling)是(shi)雙方當事(shi)人(ren)(ren)的程(cheng)序合意；首席仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)員(yuan)選(xuan)任違(wei)反《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)規(gui)(gui)則(ze)》第(di)(di)12條(tiao)第(di)(di)5款規(gui)(gui)定(ding)，故構(gou)成仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序與當事(shi)人(ren)(ren)協議不符(fu)的情形；案涉標(biao)的物電(dian)磁輻(fu)射超標(biao)，危害社會(hui)(hui)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)共安全(quan)，執行(xing)該裁(cai)(cai)決將(jiang)違(wei)反內地(di)社會(hui)(hui)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)共利益等(deng)。
【裁判結果】
北京市第(di)(di)(di)四中級人(ren)民法院認(ren)(ren)為(wei)，國際(ji)商會國際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)院在香(xiang)港(gang)(gang)作出的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)，應(ying)認(ren)(ren)定(ding)(ding)(ding)為(wei)香(xiang)港(gang)(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)。關于(yu)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭組成(cheng)及仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)是(shi)否(fou)與當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)協議(yi)不(bu)符(fu)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)問題，由于(yu)J公(gong)司未能(neng)舉證(zheng)證(zheng)明當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)對第(di)(di)(di)三(san)名(ming)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)任(ren)命(ming)約(yue)定(ding)(ding)(ding)了另一種程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)，依據《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)(ze)》第(di)(di)(di)12條(tiao)(tiao)第(di)(di)(di)5款和第(di)(di)(di)13條(tiao)(tiao)第(di)(di)(di)2項(xiang)規(gui)定(ding)(ding)(ding)，擔任(ren)首(shou)席仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)第(di)(di)(di)三(san)名(ming)仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)由仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)院任(ren)命(ming)，秘書(shu)長(chang)可(ke)(ke)以確(que)認(ren)(ren)當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)提(ti)名(ming)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)或(huo)根據他們之間(jian)協議(yi)提(ti)名(ming)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)人(ren)選(xuan)擔任(ren)首(shou)席仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)。本案(an)(an)首(shou)席仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)經(jing)聯(lian)席仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)員(yuan)聯(lian)合(he)提(ti)名(ming)，由仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)院秘書(shu)長(chang)確(que)認(ren)(ren)，該(gai)任(ren)命(ming)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)不(bu)違反《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)(ze)》的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)上述規(gui)定(ding)(ding)(ding)。《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)(ze)》第(di)(di)(di)22條(tiao)(tiao)第(di)(di)(di)2項(xiang)規(gui)定(ding)(ding)(ding)：“為(wei)確(que)保有(you)效管理(li)案(an)(an)件，仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭經(jing)洽商當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)后(hou)，可(ke)(ke)采取(qu)其認(ren)(ren)為(wei)適當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)措施，但該(gai)等措施不(bu)應(ying)違反當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)任(ren)何約(yue)定(ding)(ding)(ding)。”對于(yu)當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)未能(neng)按照仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭制定(ding)(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)計(ji)劃提(ti)交文件的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)，仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭可(ke)(ke)以決(jue)(jue)定(ding)(ding)(ding)是(shi)否(fou)接(jie)受。仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭接(jie)受珠海某公(gong)司遲(chi)交的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)時(shi)間(jian)表(biao)未違反《ICC仲(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)(ze)》和當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)之間(jian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)協議(yi)。另，案(an)(an)涉(she)爭議(yi)系平等民事主體間(jian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)合(he)同爭議(yi)，處理(li)結果僅影響合(he)同當(dang)(dang)(dang)(dang)事人(ren)，不(bu)涉(she)及社會公(gong)共安(an)全，案(an)(an)涉(she)產(chan)品是(shi)否(fou)符(fu)合(he)合(he)同約(yue)定(ding)(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)檢驗標準等，亦非認(ren)(ren)定(ding)(ding)(ding)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)危害社會公(gong)共安(an)全的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)依據。綜上，案(an)(an)涉(she)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)(jue)不(bu)存在《安(an)排(pai)》第(di)(di)(di)七條(tiao)(tiao)規(gui)定(ding)(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)情形，裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)定(ding)(ding)(ding)予以認(ren)(ren)可(ke)(ke)和執行。
【典型意義】
本案(an)的典型意義在于(yu)重申了對仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序自治屬性的尊重。仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)一(yi)經(jing)當(dang)(dang)事人(ren)選(xuan)擇適用，則(ze)成為仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)機(ji)構、仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭(ting)、當(dang)(dang)事人(ren)在仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)過(guo)程(cheng)中應(ying)予遵守的程(cheng)序規(gui)范(fan)，也是認可(ke)和(he)執行階段人(ren)民法院判斷仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭(ting)組成以及(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序是否合法的主要(yao)依(yi)據。當(dang)(dang)事人(ren)違反(fan)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)程(cheng)序令時，仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)庭(ting)有(you)權在仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)規(gui)則(ze)的框架內作出(chu)(chu)判斷，決(jue)定(ding)如何處理。本案(an)還對國(guo)際(ji)商會(hui)國(guo)際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)院在香(xiang)港(gang)作出(chu)(chu)的裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)屬于(yu)香(xiang)港(gang)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)、裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)不違反(fan)內地(di)社(she)會(hui)公共利益等(deng)問題(ti)進行了逐(zhu)一(yi)闡述(shu)，最后依(yi)據《安排》裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)定(ding)認可(ke)和(he)執行案(an)涉裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)，有(you)效保障香(xiang)港(gang)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)決(jue)在內地(di)的執行，對于(yu)香(xiang)港(gang)提升亞太地(di)區國(guo)際(ji)仲(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)(cai)(cai)樞紐(niu)地(di)位具(ju)有(you)積極(ji)意義。
【案號】北京(jing)市第四中級人民法院（2021）京(jing)04認(ren)港3號
日期：2024-9-5 11:30:02 | 關閉 |
Copyright © 1999-2021 法律圖書館
.
.
