cciia.org.cn 2022-10-10 13:38:51 中國法院(yuan)網
中國法院網訊（劉凌雄 魏昆）近日，江西省南昌市西湖區人(ren)(ren)(ren)民法院審結了一起票(piao)據(ju)(ju)追索權糾紛案(an)件(jian)。法院認定，持票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)有權對出票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)、背(bei)書人(ren)(ren)(ren)、承兌人(ren)(ren)(ren)和保證人(ren)(ren)(ren)任何一人(ren)(ren)(ren)、數人(ren)(ren)(ren)或(huo)者全(quan)體(ti)行使追索權，并依(yi)法判(pan)令(ling)被告某(mou)貿易公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)、某(mou)建(jian)設公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)、某(mou)置業公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)連帶支付原告南昌某(mou)公(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)票(piao)據(ju)(ju)金額30萬元(yuan)及(ji)利(li)息。
經審理查明，2022年(nian)5月26日，案外人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)某科技有限公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)將票(piao)據(ju)號尾號為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)74458的匯票(piao)，背書(shu)轉讓給(gei)原告(gao)(gao)南昌(chang)某公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)，該匯票(piao)的出(chu)(chu)票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)、承兌人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)被告(gao)(gao)某置(zhi)業公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)，收票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)被告(gao)(gao)某建設公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)，票(piao)面金額為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)民幣30萬(wan)元，出(chu)(chu)票(piao)日期(qi)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)2021年(nian)5月27日，到期(qi)日期(qi)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)2022年(nian)5月26日。該匯票(piao)經多次(ci)連續背書(shu)。原告(gao)(gao)南昌(chang)某公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)最(zui)后(hou)持票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)。原告(gao)(gao)于(yu)2022年(nian)5月26日提示付(fu)(fu)款，于(yu)2022年(nian)5月31日被拒絕簽收，票(piao)據(ju)狀態為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)：提示付(fu)(fu)款已拒付(fu)(fu)。為(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)(wei)此，持票(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)原告(gao)(gao)南昌(chang)某公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)向(xiang)法院提出(chu)(chu)票(piao)據(ju)追索權之訴，要求收款人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)某貿易公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)、某建設公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)、某置(zhi)業公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)連帶支付(fu)(fu)上述票(piao)面金額30萬(wan)及利(li)息(xi)。
法(fa)院認為，根據(ju)《中(zhong)華(hua)人(ren)(ren)(ren)民共和(he)(he)國票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)據(ju)法(fa)》第(di)二(er)十(shi)六條規定(ding)：“出(chu)票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)簽發匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)后，即承(cheng)(cheng)擔保證該匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)承(cheng)(cheng)兌(dui)和(he)(he)付(fu)(fu)(fu)款(kuan)的責任。出(chu)票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)在(zai)匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)得不到(dao)承(cheng)(cheng)兌(dui)或(huo)者付(fu)(fu)(fu)款(kuan)時，應當向(xiang)持票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)清償本法(fa)第(di)七十(shi)條、第(di)七十(shi)一條規定(ding)的金(jin)額和(he)(he)費(fei)用。” 本案(an)中(zhong)，被告(gao)某置業公(gong)司作(zuo)為匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)的出(chu)票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)和(he)(he)承(cheng)(cheng)兌(dui)人(ren)(ren)(ren)，在(zai)案(an)涉匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)得不到(dao)承(cheng)(cheng)兌(dui)或(huo)付(fu)(fu)(fu)款(kuan)時，應當向(xiang)原告(gao)支(zhi)付(fu)(fu)(fu)案(an)涉匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)金(jin)額30萬元及利息。根據(ju)《中(zhong)華(hua)人(ren)(ren)(ren)民共和(he)(he)國票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)據(ju)法(fa)》第(di)六十(shi)一條第(di)一款(kuan)規定(ding)：“匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)到(dao)期(qi)被拒絕付(fu)(fu)(fu)款(kuan)的，持票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)人(ren)(ren)(ren)可(ke)以對背(bei)(bei)書人(ren)(ren)(ren)行使追索權。”被告(gao)某建設(she)公(gong)司、南昌安墨(mo)貿易有限公(gong)司作(zuo)為背(bei)(bei)書人(ren)(ren)(ren)，原告(gao)向(xiang)其行使追索權符合法(fa)律規定(ding)，予以支(zhi)持。利息按全國銀(yin)行間同業拆(chai)借中(zhong)心(xin)公(gong)布的貸款(kuan)利率計算，自(zi)案(an)涉匯票(piao)(piao)(piao)(piao)到(dao)期(qi)之次日(ri)（2022年5月27日(ri)）起(qi)至被告(gao)實際給付(fu)(fu)(fu)之日(ri)止(zhi)。
據(ju)此，法(fa)院依法(fa)作出前述判(pan)(pan)決。判(pan)(pan)決宣判(pan)(pan)后，原被告均服(fu)判(pan)(pan)息訴(su)。
日期：2022-10-10 13:38:51 | 關閉 |
Copyright © 1999-2021 法律(lv)圖書館
.
.
